Of particular interest is the 37% target of the portfolio for alternative investments. The current 23.7% actual allocation sounds about right all things considered. Still, I can’t help but wonder if the 37% alternative target is expressing too much faith in Wall Street engineered financial products like hedge funds and private equity that promise better than market returns based on 1) a return premium due to their lack of liquidity, or 2) better management due to high fees. While the risk in the real estate allocation can be attributed to the asset class, the risk of the remaining alternatives can probably be attributed to the ability of the hedge fund managers to execute their strategies. Let’s hope the plan administrators don’t buy too much Wall Street BS about these strategies.
Pinnacle’s DA portfolio outperformed this portfolio for the trailing 3-yr and 5-yr period. To be fair, this looks like a typical institutional portfolio construction to me. Pinnacle assets under management: $870 million. State of Md. Pension assets: $35.9 billion.